Pain Assessment Tool For Postoperative Pain Week 2

754 words - 3 pages

Untitled

Running Head: PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain

[Writer Name]

[Institute Name] 

Indeed, the experience of pain can go beyond the physiological sense of the situation, which is central to the psychogenic perspective, in which diagnostic tests can not reveal any pathology. Turk and Okifuji (1999) argue that the experience of pain affects the emotional, social, family, professional and physical activity. In addition to pain is a physiological phenomenon, but also influenced by psychological and cultural factors.

In general, the study of changes in response to changing perceptions of pain. They have shifted from the notion of a purely sensory phenomenon, and experience that includes both sensory and reactive (emotional) components (Hardy et al. 1952, Beecher 1959) and, finally, one of which is sensory / discriminative, motivational / emotional and cognitive / behavioral components play part (Melzack and Casey 1968). During this process, the researchers emphasize the various interpretations and, therefore, assessment tools have been developed to investigate the various components, as discussed below.

Sensory / discriminative

Sensory / discriminative component of pain was primarily on the basis of quantitative psychophysical methods that attempt to determine the threshold of pain and rating scale methods. The measured variable, as the gravity and intensity of pain.

Psychophysical method is widely used in the period after the Second World War (Atkins et al. 1996). Pain threshold was determined by asking respondents to identify the point of increasing the incentives for continuous pain, which is separated from the Non-painful painful experience. However, these methods have been criticized for the inconsistent results of the production (Kutscher and Kutscher 1957). Nonlinearity, which exists in relation to different levels of pain may be the cause of failure of these instruments to assess more reliably. Recently, Atkins et al. (1996) developed a...

Find Another Essay On Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 2

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 10

661 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 10Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionIt is more suitable for measuring the intensity of pain, rather than its duration and nature over time. VAS is recommended, based on its methodological qualities of reliability, validity, sensitivity and relevance to day operations people. He is also one of the most widely used tools for

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 7

665 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 7Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionThis is based on the measurement of the six pain-related variables: pain, anxiety, verbal statements on the degree of pain, skeletal muscle response, respiration and the amount of sweat. Although the authors claim that the reliability is satisfactory, the correlation values were not provided

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 3

784 words - 3 pages Untitled Running Head: PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain [Writer Name] [Institute Name] Most of them are usually adopted methods can be regarded as an assessment scale, including: • Verbal Descriptor / a thing Scale (VD / RS) (Kiel 1948), • Numerical rating scale (NRS) (Downie et al. 1978), • The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Clarke and

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 4

743 words - 3 pages Untitled Running Head: PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain [Writer Name] [Institute Name]  Its main disadvantage is its unreliability for the elderly or very young patients who may not be able to distinguish between the numbers (Flaherty 1996). Although the NRS has more categories than the VDS, they both consist of discrete categories, of which the

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 7

799 words - 3 pages Untitled Running Head: PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain [Writer Name] [Institute Name]  This is based on the measurement of the six pain-related variables: pain, anxiety, verbal statements on the degree of pain, skeletal muscle response, respiration and the amount of sweat. Although the authors claim that the reliability is satisfactory, the correlation

Pain Assessment Week 2

619 words - 2 pages Running Head: Week 2Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionIndeed, the experience of pain can go beyond the physiological sense of the situation, which is central to the psychogenic perspective, in which diagnostic tests can not reveal any pathology. Turk and Okifuji (1999) argue that the experience of pain affects the emotional, social, family

Pain Assessment Week 5

637 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 5Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionA study by Scott and Huskisson (1976) (N = 100) found no significant differences between the distribution of scores measured in the vertical and horizontal VAS. The ratio between these two scales also proved to be very high (r = 0,99, P <0,001), adding to the reality.DiscussionSome authors

Pain Assessment Week 11

646 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 11Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionThe VAS can be used reliably in an emergency setting for acute pain experience. Intra-class correlation coefficient with 95% confidence intervals was calculated (0.97, 95% confidence intervals 0.96-0.98) for the measurement of acute pain in adults of respondents was 1 minute every 30 minutes to

Pain Assessment Week 3

655 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 3Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionMost of pains are usually adopted methods can be regarded as an assessment scale, including:• Verbal Descriptor / a thing Scale (VD / RS) (Kiel 1948),• Numerical rating scale (NRS) (Downie et al. 1978),• The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Clarke and Spear 1964).DiscussionKiel (1948

Pain Assessment Week 4

630 words - 3 pages Running Head: WEEK 4Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionIts main disadvantage is its unreliability for the elderly or very young patients who may not be able to distinguish between the numbers (Flaherty 1996). Although the NRS has more categories than the VDS, they both consist of discrete categories, of which the respondent must choose only one. As

Pain Assessment Tools

1240 words - 5 pages appropriate. The nurse will continue to assess every 15 minutes by performing another NIPS assessment (University of Pennsylvania, Almanac, 2002).Asking a patient to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10 can assess the quality of a patient's pain. Zero is considered no pain and ten is considered as being the worst pain they have ever experienced. Another common tool to use as a measurable guide for rating pain is The Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating

Similar Essays

Pain Assessment Tool For Postoperative Pain Week 6

607 words - 2 pages Running Head: Week 6Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionit is surprising that this Scale is not a "no" or "not alarming 'category. Also noteworthy, that no discussion of its reliability and validity has been presented (McGuire 1988). The second tool, Tursky's (1976) Pain Perception Profile (PPP) have been developed for measuring the intensity of

Pain Assessment Tool For Postoperative Pain Week 12

675 words - 3 pages Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainAs mentioned earlier, Clark and Spear (1964) found the VAS to be sensitive to changes in self-assessed well-being. In addition, it was shown that it reacts to all procedures that alter the experience of pain, for example, the use of pharmacological interventions, as well as changes in intensity in different patients with acute or chronic pain (Belanger et al. 1989, Price et al. 1989, Choiniere et al

Pain Assessment Tool For Postoperative Pain Week 5

637 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 5Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionA study by Scott and Huskisson (1976) (N = 100) found no significant differences between the distribution of scores measured in the vertical and horizontal VAS. The ratio between these two scales also proved to be very high (r = 0,99, P <0,001), adding to the reality.DiscussionSome authors

Pain Assessment Tool For Postoperative Pain Week 11

646 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 11Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionThe VAS can be used reliably in an emergency setting for acute pain experience. Intra-class correlation coefficient with 95% confidence intervals was calculated (0.97, 95% confidence intervals 0.96-0.98) for the measurement of acute pain in adults of respondents was 1 minute every 30 minutes to