Nuclear Limitations And Disarmament Essay

983 words - 4 pages

Nuclear Limitations and Disarmament

When a lone B-29 flew over Hiroshima on August 29, 1945, the first nuclear weapon changed the course of international trust and relations. From that point on, countries tried to control each other with building and stockpiling superior nuclear arms. The question of nuclear limitations and of nuclear disarmament finally came under world review. The idea of one country possessing enough firepower to destroy the world is thoughtprovoking, but a look at the nuclear proponents brings up several good points. The concept of a world free of nuclear energy and weapons would shock most people. Nuclear power has existed for quite some time and has provided valuable services. If the structure of nuclear programs, weapons, research, and power plants, was removed, the world would be thrown into a state of political and economic imbalance. The failure of the five nuclear countries, U.S., Russia, Britain, France, and China, to remain vigilant in their threat of nuclear power would cause third world countries to challenge the position of the five countries and bully their foes. The thought of nuclear disarmament is useless. Stability of peace, power, and trust are results of competition in the nuclear arms race of the two most powerful nuclear countries.
The coalition of trust between countries considered to be a superpower by showing economic and militaristic power has kept other less powerful countries from acting rashly or blindly. Such was the case with Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait. The severe involvement of the U.S. and the minimal involvement by the U.N.’s posed a serious threat to the Iraq’s well-being. If Iraq provoked the U.S. enough, we might have turned to nuclear arms and solved the matter conclusively. By having nuclear presence in the world with two or more superpower countries, they can combat the threat of dictatorship and its expansion, instead of having a single indecisive group such as the U.N. controlling the arms. This structure allows for third world nations to develop, but in the way that they should be developing: raising the standards of living and advancing the general welfare of the people. If a third world country decides to develop a nuclear bomb, then that country would be putting a strain on the trust between the two ruling nuclear superpowers. One superpower will strongly disapproves, while the other power would choose the new nuclear country as another member of their “team”. Then the trust of cease fire comes into play, because the new nuclear country might decide to attack, and if given new weapons or more powerful ones, then that could lead into world wide war.
The equal destructive capability between Russia and the U.S. during the cold war prevented each from firing at one another. Many times the U.S....

Find Another Essay On Nuclear Limitations and Disarmament

A Proposal for the International Elimination of Nuclear Weapons

1729 words - 7 pages The Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) set out a model of the Nuclear Weapons Convention (NWC) in 1997. The model underwent revision and reforms in 2007. The text puts a proposal that international law completely eliminates and bans the use of nuclear weapons. The proposal has general support from the international system. Over the years, security at the international level has faced opposition when it comes to the disarmament of nuclear

Discuss the role of nuclear power in the modern world. Analysis the possible influence and the signification to the development based on its role

927 words - 4 pages , for his reason, cardiac disease, pulmonary heart disease and bone disease are mainly treated by this method instead of surgery. Equally, there are limitations, but seems very trivial, that is, time-consuming. Overall, nuclear medicine illustrated the potential of using nuclear power on various aspects and its value to the modern world. Regarding to the nuclear weapons, they give people an impression of the ultimate destruction weapon because of

Chemical and Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction

1536 words - 7 pages . Third, the NPT as a treaty between states potentially cannot deal with the threat of non-state actor such as terrorists who may have access to nuclear weapons. Last, the unwillingness of five nuclear weapon holding states namely the U.S., the U.K., China, France and Russia to pursue nuclear disarmament (pp. xi-xii). A notable case study to illustrate the limitations of the NPT is North Korea. North Korea signed the NPT in 1985 after the Soviet

Nayarit Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons

1600 words - 6 pages weapons” is now needed. Furthermore, Zambia made a strong appeal for a ban on the use, production, and stockpiling of nuclear weapons, saying that a comprehensive ban had “gained grip” in the international system over the past couple of years. A ban is the preferred first step towards the elimination of nuclear weapons, it said. The idea of multilateral nuclear disarmament is as old as the bomb itself and its survivors who either have experienced

Disarment, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Outer Space: Mongolia´s Stand

1504 words - 7 pages multilateral approaches to ensuring the world’s peace. I. Relationship between Disarmament and Development According to a press released text, UNITED STATES CALLED ON TO REDUCE NON-STRATEGIC NUCLEAR WEAPONS BY DRAFT TEXT APPROVED IN DISARMAMENT COMMITTEE, it

India and Pakistan: a modern history of the antagonistic relationship between nuclear neighbors and what it could mean for the future of the free world

3218 words - 13 pages States' policy goals are not revolutionary. The most important goal is to encourage stability in South Asia. The government also aims to get bilateral relations with both countries back on track, and foster economic growth and development through trade and investment. Finally, they would like to safeguard both national and global interests in nuclear nonproliferation and the disarmament process and restore the pre-test momentum of the movement.One

Nuclear Disarmament

1213 words - 5 pages United States, Indonesia will not change its position on nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation, and peaceful uses of nuclear technoogy (Lieggi). Actions taken by your government with regard to the issue In 1970, Indonesia signed the Treaty on the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), and in 1996, acceded to the Additional Protocol. This treaty is about nuclear disarmament, nonproliferation, and peaceful uses of nuclear technoogy. In 1996

The United States Road Map to World Peace and Security

1100 words - 4 pages action must be conveyed and acted upon by the rest of the UN members to be effectively enforceable. According to Jennifer Weeks, who wrote an article about the message delivered by President Barack Obama to the United Nations Assembly. For the first time in the history of the United States, President Barack Obama pledged to work with other nuclear nations for a serious nuclear disarmament program calling for a tighter nuclear arms reduction

International Law

1207 words - 5 pages Nonproliferation Treaty agreement relies on three pillars: 1) nonproliferation, 2) disarmament, and 3) peaceful use of nuclear energy (Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, 2010). Nonproliferation concentrates on the transfer of nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosives. The NPT and larger nonproliferation government are not static. Over the past 40 years the regime has tackled and adapted itself to address many challenges. Despite

Necluer Weopons and Their Effect on the World

796 words - 4 pages , concerns about the amount and effect of nuclear fallout produced by these weapons grew. In 1955, a group of five countries including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, France and the Soviet Union formed a committee as part of the U.N. Disarmament Commission to discuss the cessation of nuclear weapons testing. The committee made little progress over the next several years due to disagreements over disarmament, test-bans, and most

The Non-Proliferation Treaty: Reasons For Its Failiures And Suggestions For Its Improvement And Strenghtening

3997 words - 16 pages "stop the number at five and commit those five to work toward disarmament." The four main goals of the NPT were to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, either directly or indirectly, from possessor to non-possessor states, to safeguard nuclear materials and facilities, make benefits of nuclear energy available to other parties, and to promote disarmament. The last provision was particularly important to non-nuclear weapons states which "feared

Similar Essays

Practicality Of Disarmament Essay

3866 words - 15 pages than to regulating and giving up of their own armaments. Hence India did not sign this treaty, which was one-sided. In-spite of all this limitations, this treaty succeeded from barring nuclear weapons from 70% of the earth's surface, which was a significant contribution towards disarmament efforts.2) Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT)Strategic Arms Limitation Talks took place between U.S.A and the Soviet Union on May 1972. The aim of these

Disarmament:Good Or Bad? Essay

1233 words - 5 pages . After all of this if someone has survived that then they have to deal with the radiation poisoning(Harris). Also today about 10 counties have nuclear arms. These countries include the U.S.A, Russia, the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Isriel and Pakistan("Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What?"). disarmament of the United Stated isn't a good idea because it is dangerous, isn't wise, and the govenment needs to protect its citizens

After The Atomic Bomb Essay

2536 words - 10 pages entirely resolve the global nuclear threat, they moved the two world powers towards progressive disarmament. In 1982 the United States and the Soviet Union started a new round of negotiations called the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) (1). Additional limitations were included in both START talks (1). Once the iron curtain fell and the Soviet Union disintegrated, Russia would be removed of its nuclear weapons and the nuclear conflict was

Controling The Spread Of Nuclear Weapons

919 words - 4 pages eliminate nuclear weapons elsewhere. Treaties such as the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaties I and II, and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty were some of the first major building blocks of the arms control and disarmament regime, particularly concerning nuclear proliferation. This regime was initially put in place by the world’s major powers as an effort to maintain the status quo and have only 5 countries with