Libel Essay

1048 words - 4 pages

Libel


When involved in the running or managing of a business, one must always be mindful of the mistakes and wrongdoing that could possibly occur, and how the business will ultimately be affected. There are two areas of the law which deal with these types of problems, consisting of tort and criminal law. A tort is a civil wrong, which does not arise from a contract, and involves injuries to particular persons or property, whereas a crime is considered a public wrong, which is punishable by the state.
In tort law, there are three different kinds of torts, including intentional, negligent, and strict liability. An intentional tort requires that the defendant meant to do a certain action, but not necessarily to harm a person or thing. Negligence is a situation in which harm is caused by accident, and strict liability is where harm is done, but one is responsible without proof of carelessness or blame. In tort cases, the injured party can seek compensatory damages, which could be medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and more. An injured party might also seek punitive damages, which are designed to punish the person at fault or prevent the same thing from happening again.
There are many different areas of intentional torts that can arise from an act of intent. Some of these torts committed against a person are battery, assault, false imprisonment, fraud, defamation, and others. Some of the intentional torts committed against property are trespass to real property, trespass to personal property, conversion, and nuisance.
Defamation is defined as discrediting a person's reputation by oral or written publication. Slander is the spoken form of the tort, and libel is defamation in print or some other tangible form, such as a picture, movie, video, and many times a radio or television statement is also considered libel. There are three things necessary in order to prove defamation, including (1) a false statement, (2) harm to the victim's reputation, and (3) publication of the statement, which must reach someone other than the person being defamed. Defamation can occur toward any living person or organization, but public figures must also prove malice, which generally requires a showing of actual knowledge of the falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth.
Although a person is usually required to show actual harm in a case of slander, sometimes the statements are so innately damaging that the person need not show actual damage. Statements of this kind include allegations of serious sexual misconduct, commission of a serious crime, professional incompetence, or having a loathsome disease, and are called slander per se. Libel also does not generally require a showing of actual harm.
This area of tort law is exhibited clearly in a St. Louis Post Dispatch article by Michael White. The article, titled "Brown & Williamson fights movie depiction," is about a cigarette maker attacking Wlalt Disney for distorting...

Find Another Essay On Libel

Lawsuits Involving Social Media Essay

1318 words - 6 pages only one of few major problems with that come with these networks. There have been cases when people libel one another, trying to ruin each other’s lives. There are teenagers bullying other teenagers on these networks and we call it cyberbullying. Two other major problems are invasion of a person’s privacy and Facebook tracking your every move. Tracking/Privacy Everyone believes that when they log out of Facebook that no one can see what you’re

Freedom Of Speech

336 words - 2 pages chance to understand others.Without this freedom people could not stand up for what they believe in. Without the freedom of speech all other freedoms are lost.Federal and state laws restrict many kinds of expression, such as libel, slander, obscenity and treason, because they are damaging to a society as a whole. Slander and libel, is when someone lies about someone to hurt his or her reputation. Treason is when someone gives military secrets to

Gedney

1383 words - 6 pages The primary source under analysis was a libel to the district court of the United States in and for the district of Connecticut. A libel is a written claim presented by a plaintiff in an action at admiralty law, and this particular libel was written by Thomas R. Gedney who was the Lieutenant Commander of the U.S. Naval Brig entitled the Washington. The libel was written following the confiscation of the Spanish slave schooner, the Amistad, by

Law and Ethics in Journalism - Freedom of Speech

1594 words - 6 pages allegations. (Pearson, 2007)In law, defamation, which is also referred to as libel or slander, is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image. Slander refers to a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or

The History of Crime and Its Evolution

1758 words - 8 pages crime. Over the years, the tools have become the basis of the federal government’s fresh focus on terrorism and international organized crime in the 21st century. The crime of obscene libel has also evolved over the years. The crime was included under ridicule, statements vilifying a person and bringing them to hatred, and contempt among others. In 1676, the charges for blasphemous libel was upheld, making three forms of libel referred to as

Social Media and the Law

2105 words - 8 pages ., a publisher of a newsletter, sued the publisher of an online rival newspaper for libel and added the online service CompuServe as a codefendant, claiming that because CompuServe published the information it was also responsible. A federal court ruled that online services were simply distributors and therefore not liable for any information posted on their servers (Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe, Inc.). This set precedent for online libel for years to

Analysis of The Defamation Act 2013

1578 words - 6 pages a cause of act for defamation are: A untruthful and offensive statement regarding another; The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party; If the offensive situation is of public concern, fault amounting at least to carelessness on the share of the publisher; and Injury to the plaintiff. Slander and libel are both kinds of defamation, which refers to statements that hurt another person's name. While there are connections, each

3 major restraints that the government has on the media

599 words - 2 pages what they will say, even if it is unpopular and embarrassing to the government or to individual politicians. However, no one is free to publish false information that will harm someones reputation, this is called libel. A Magazine or Newspaper may be sued if the information that it contains is considered obscene, libelous, or incites someone to commit an illegal act - this tends to be very difficult to prove in court and government officials

Overriding State Interest

675 words - 3 pages case of San Diego Building Trade Council v. Gamon, which is a case of defamation, the Court decided to dismiss the case because the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) did not displace the application of policies implemented by states in cases of libels. The Court agreed that it would be an overriding of state interest to protect workers against libel and that the federal labor law does not really provide protection for workers against damage to

The Growth OF POLITICS AND MEDIA

885 words - 4 pages having cable TV access, newspapers in every city and town with major newspaper centers reaching far more than ever before. Then the introduction of the Internet; nothing would ever be the same. The year was 1734 and America saw the incarceration of John Peter Zenger, publisher of the NEW YORK Weekly Journal, for publishing articles that ridiculed Governor Cosby of New York. Cosby accused Zenger of seditious libel. The law of seditious libel held

Criminal Law

779 words - 4 pages To discuss this section, it is crucially important to get to an observation about the two different situations on how vilification takes place. The two contrasting forms are libel and calumny. These are rather different sorts of abuse. Libel has a connector to the drafted wording that has been advertised. Defamation is the verbal ephemeral vilification. Libel is the gesture done intrinsically and is it consider as an offense as well as a civil

Similar Essays

The Blood Libel Essay

949 words - 4 pages The Blood Libel: Book Report Characters: The protagonist is Sam Klein who is an immigrant from Russia living in Winnipeg who is a guard for a club in Point Douglas who is famous for being a problem solver, so when the Winnipeg Police Department has a Case about a little girl they can't solve they ask for his help and to find out what happened he has to revisit his life in Russia where he had seen something like this before and when a local

Libel And Invasion Of Privacy Essay

1188 words - 5 pages Libel and Invasion of Privacy Libel and invasion of privacy are two very important issues dealing with broadcast media. The two are very similar but different from each. Libel deals more with what was actually printed or broadcast, where as invasion of privacy deals with how the information was actually gathered. Both have laws to regulate and influence what kind of information is gathered and, how it is actually obtained. Libel simply

Rise And Risk Of Libel On Social Media

2000 words - 8 pages Rise and Risk of Libel on Social Media Social media is a fascinating and compelling form of interaction between people all over the world. It allows us to dispatch information to the public swiftly but unlike broadcasting through radio or television, there is no gatekeeper. Information that is put on the Internet never really goes away and because of its instantaneous feed to the public, it can cause irreparable damages. These damages

New York Times Vs Sullivan An Opinionated Overview Of The Case And Our Thoughts On What Category It Should Fall Under

866 words - 3 pages Montgomery Alabama Police Commissioner, claimed these errors damaged his reputation and he won $500,000 in a libel case in Alabama. The case was appealed to the US Supreme Court, where the decision was unanimously reversed, saying the New York Times was not guilty of reckless disregard for the truth. The Court ruled that the importance of free debate in a democratic society was more important than factual errors that might upset or even damage public