Disagreement In Natural And Human Sciences

1473 words - 6 pages

In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences?I think that disagreement is the key to a deeper understanding in all endeavours. If we only surround ourselves with those who agree with us then we will never stretch our minds nor test our limitations. There are dissimilarities between disagreement and hostility as they don't necessarily connect with each other because hostility deals with emotions and it is the act of warfare due to the hatred towards something.That's why I make sure not to surround myself with people who almost always support me in my decisions or believe my claims because I need to be tested and have others point out to me where I might have been going wrong and what I should do to fix the problem. After an argument due to disagreement takes place, I tend to discover many new facts on my way to prove my point. I don't always handle the disagreement or criticism well but as you might expect when I step back and breathe and realize that the other person has the best of intentions then I take their advice to the heart. Therefore disagreement sometimes leads to new discoveries.Once, I had a disagreement with my cousin about 'which one came first into this world, the plant or the seed?' We argued about it for days because I claimed that the seed came first whereas my cousin claimed that the plant came first. After about a month, my cousin came up to me and reasoned it out with me that it is the plants that came first into this world. It started off from single-celled organisms and it went on evolving to multi-celled organisms. In the pursuit of knowing about which one came first, I realized that we came to understand the evolution theory better than before and a lot of details about plants and its functions. Basically, disagreement leads a person to understand more about the topic and explore various aspects of it.Disagreement is a fundamental element in the natural sciences, without it there would be no form of development. In the natural sciences there are a set of specified criteria that must be filled before something can be taken into consideration. There must be a scientific method of: observation, creating a hypothesis, conducting experiments and then from there a law is created which then accumulates into a theory. It should be measurable, repeatable and controllable to be considered a natural science. However, the theory should be re-checked and tried to be proved wrong if in case there are any errors or exceptions. In other words, it is encouraged to falsify a theory. Falsification is the idea that after a theory is created, a scientist must try their very best to prove the theory wrong, and it is through that process that the theory becomes stronger, as more and more possibilities are taken away, the theory becomes more reliable. As Ken Miller said in the Intelligent Design video, scientists do not believe their theories are absolutely true but it is the best natural...

Find Another Essay On Disagreement in Natural and Human sciences

TOK Essay: What is it About Theories in the Human Sciences and Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1507 words - 6 pages theories in Human Sciences and Natural Sciences that make them Convincing? To begin this research, there are definitions of some key terms in the title that I will explain. The principal that introduces something to be a theory in sciences is that it must be an idea/claim that is descriptive, predictable and explanatory in nature. This is built around ideas that are supported by evidence, which corresponds to logic with the current knowledge

Ethics in the Arts and Natural Sciences

1363 words - 6 pages Ethical judgements often add complex implications to the pursuit of knowledge, regardless of the area of knowledge. In the areas of the arts and natural sciences, ethics can pertain in diverging ways. For the arts, ethics often comes into question when determining whether or not it is worthwhile to sacrifice ethics for artistic choices and messages. For the natural sciences, in contrast, ethics is often debated in the pursuit of new knowledge

Variations of Knowledge in The Arts and Natural Sciences

1541 words - 7 pages The two areas of knowledge that I am going to explore are The Arts and The Natural Sciences. In relation to the question, my initial perspective is that the Arts is an area of knowledge that is somewhat contentious due to its subjective nature, as firstly it can be hard to accept something as art. Conversely, the Natural Sciences is an area of knowledge that is based on objective truths and therefore when I originally approached this question, I

History and Human Sciences

1828 words - 8 pages The language in this knowledge claim allows for multiple interpretations. Hence, we will assume that the past refers to both the distant and recent past, and that the phrase “change the future” includes further developing the AoK of human science's ability to predict ways to change the future. To check the validity of the knowledge claim, we will look at both the AoK history and the AoK human sciences in relation to the past and future

Compare and Contrast the natural and social sciences in their philosophy and approach to research

1072 words - 5 pages , ideas and meanings constructed by the human being in a social contextual, reality. (Alan Bryman , 2008). The debate of the applicability of the natural sciences, philosophy and approach, to research by the social sciences has its roots in a traditional dispute by the positivist school of thought in contrast to the interpretivist one, that emerged as an alternative and as an opposing standing by various social researchers. It is pertinent to

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1744 words - 7 pages seek to elucidate the rules that govern the natural world through scientific methods. Ethics has caused a lot of constrains in the field of natural sciences. Many medical research institutions make use of animals for testing. Animals may be subject to experimentation useful for gaining knowledge about human diseases or for testing potential human treatments. About 20 million animals are experimented on and killed annually, three-fourths for medical

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1675 words - 7 pages ethical judgments. In the natural sciences, ethics affects the methods that are available for the production of knowledge. This raises the question of should ethical judgment stop the use of certain methodologies that are deemed unethical? The first example of this happening is the use of humans as test subjects. In this instance ethical judgments should and do stop the use of this methodology. This is because of all the potential harm that can come

Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1318 words - 6 pages The arts are works created by people who want to evoke an aesthetically pleasing response. These responses are more likely to be in the form of emotions. When one creates a piece of art work, the aesthetics, meaning and beauty of it can be detracted by moral values. The arts however are more vulnerable to the implications of moral values than the natural sciences. Arts can be in many different forms, the most common are in paints, pencil

Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1560 words - 6 pages even more. On the other hand the natural sciences is almost entirely about gaining new knowledge and improving what is already known. In this age, developments in natural sciences are nearly only about human advancement. Whether is medically or discovering new things.I am going to mainly focus on how various countries, such as Argentina, the United States, Russia, Iran and France, tested their space equipment. From the mid 1940s all the way to

Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1382 words - 6 pages Production of knowledge is generally seen in a positive light. However, when ethics and morality become involved in the process of production, judgements will undoubtedly be made that may seem to limit the availability of that knowledge. Ethical judgements are made by the combination of a knower, his or her standard of value, and the situation itself. In the field of the arts and natural sciences, ethics plays a crucial role in the extent one

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences

752 words - 4 pages process by which an individual determines that one alternative is morally right and another alternative is morally wrong. “Broadly, ethical judgement can be defined so as to include the decision process as well as the action itself.” This essay aims to discuss the way in which ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and natural sciences. Scientific research is used in the production of knowledge

Similar Essays

What Is It About Theories In Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Make Them Convincing?

1253 words - 5 pages When looking at the human sciences and natural sciences, one may question the validity of a claim or choose to support it without any evidentiary support. For many years, science has been accepted by many as the dominant cognitive paradigm, or model of knowledge. In fact, there are also people who believe that science is the only pathway for gaining knowledge, and if something isn’t provable through science, then it should not be accepted. A

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1264 words - 5 pages Theories in both natural and human sciences have been very controversial throughout history such as evolution. Although some stand as correct and some have been proven wrong, most of them tend to have enough evidence to be considered correct. Most of these theories have endured a process for them to be rectified and considered as correct. The process depends on long observations, large amount of empirical prove and the interpretation of this

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1483 words - 6 pages , chemistry, and biology, depend on physical proof through experiments with several trials. The human sciences, which include subject areas such as sociology, economics, anthropology, and psychology, are based on human interaction, logic, and the collection of data. Information about both areas of knowledge can be gained through sense perception, reason, and emotion. An idea in the natural sciences must be pragmatic in order to confirm its

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1039 words - 4 pages specific elements that make it up, and appeal to different categories of individuals, thus making this fact believable and convincing for certain people, and not for others. So basically, just like the distinctions between truth and false; what may be convincing for me, may not necessarily be convincing for others. When taking in consideration the knowledge issue that theories in the human sciences and natural sciences have something that makes them