Cameras In The Courtroom Essay

1414 words - 6 pages

Cameras in the Courtroom

This fall, Zacarias Moussaoui is scheduled to go to trial for his participation in the airplane bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City. Along with the media frenzy that accompanies a trial of this magnitude, a separate battle is being waged between Courtroom Television Network LLC (Court-TV) and the U.S. Government over the right of the former to televise trial proceedings.
The Government of the United States’ opposition is stated in a legal brief dated January 4, 2002. Their stance is that “the televising of federal criminal trials is prohibited by both Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53 (‘The taking of photographs in the courtroom during the progress of judicial proceedings or radio broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom shall not be permitted by the court.’) and Local Rule 83.3 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.” The Government contends that Rule 83 does not allow individual judges to grant the right to televise criminal proceedings, but that the rule applies “in all situations with no exceptions.”
In section II of the brief, the prosecution attacks the claims by Court-TV that the First Amendment protects their televising of proceedings. In summarizing several Supreme Court cases where the issue of cameras in the courtroom was brought to the forefront, the U.S. Government effectively shows that Court-TV cannot claim First Amendment protection.
Section IV finds the prosecution attesting that Court-TV has given no valid argument as to why the proceedings should be televised. They claim that while opening the courtroom to the public assures that the proceedings are conducted fairly, “there is no reason to believe that televising the proceedings widely would enhance the benefits to the administration of justice obtained through open trials.”
The prosecution also admits that the televising of proceedings increases the audience, and therefore increases the educational benefits, but argues that this alone “does not warrant a constitutional requirement that television cameras be allowed at criminal trials.”
The Government points out that in Estes v Texas, 381 U.S. 532 (1965), many potential pitfalls of televised proceedings are listed, including: “(1) the possibility that televising the proceedings will have a ‘direct bearing on (a juror’s) vote as to guilt or innocence’, (2) the possibility that jurors will be ‘preoccupied with the telecasting rather than with the testimony’, (3) the possibility that jurors will be influenced by television broadcasts of the proceedings or subjected to commentary or criticism from members of the public, (4) the difficulty of obtaining an unbiased venire if a retrial is required in a case where the first trial was televised….”
Court-TV’s brief requests allowance for cameras in the courtroom. It opens with the statement that all while fifty states permit some type of television coverage, and...

Find Another Essay On Cameras in the Courtroom

Testing the effectiveness of the CCTV cameras in west palm beach, florida: Methodological advancements in the study of public surveillance

1759 words - 8 pages INTRODUCTION In recent years, there has been an intense proliferation of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) surveillance cameras in the United States, as well as abroad (Caplan, Kennedy, & Petrossian, 2011; Gill & Spriggs, 2005; La Vigne, Lowry, Markman, & Dwyer, 2011; Piza, 2012; Ratcliffe, 2006; Welsh & Farrington, 2009). In Great Britain alone, the expansion of CCTV systems is well documented (Armitage, 2002; Gill & Spriggs, 2005; Welsh

12 Angry Men: Conflict in the Courtroom

791 words - 4 pages The jurors had several conflicts in disagreeing with each other and it didn't help that they would shout over one another. The very first conflict is when juror 8 voted not guilty against the 11 guilty votes. The other 11 jurors don't seem to want to hear this man out; they don't want to hear why he has voted not guilty. Some of these men, jurors 3 and 7, just want to get this case over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't think

Should TV Cameras Be Allowed In Court? This Essay Was For A Level 300 Pych & Law Class And Looks At The Pros And Cons In How It Affects The Participants In A Trial

1151 words - 5 pages studies have shown people do not act natural around cameras, especially knowing that an opinion is set in the viewers who will see them. Often, people try to live up to the opinion.The media's overstepping of their bounds is most clear in large, high profile cases that involve famous people or terrible atrocities. Mass media understands that Americans have a desire for watching their favorite celebrities sweat under the legal pressures. The public

Categories and Types of Evidence and their Use in the Courtroom

1551 words - 6 pages , parties and juries give out then closely inspect the different forms of proof ata court trial is all governed by the law of evidence. In a way, evidence forms an extension ofcriminal procedure. It also forms an extension of civil law. In the Unites States, the FederalRules of Evidence (FRE) are the rules the federal courts follow. Most of the laws of evidence areencompassed in the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Federal Rules of Evidence has played

Macbeth is in a courtroom being trialed for being a murderer, usurper and tyrant. Write a final speech in the voice of a prosecutor

608 words - 2 pages soul rest in peace) as the rightful King of Scotland. Today we have a man before us who has clearly defied the laws of our society and the laws of the Lord.Do we dare leave his crimes unpunished?Do we dare give peace to the man who has acted against God?Honorable members of the jury, today you must decide whether this man, Macbeth, is guilty of these monstrous crimes. Macbeth's deceitful and blood-thirsty manner is indubitably shown by his lack of

Teanage Sex Education

1724 words - 7 pages this is about what cameras sitting in a courtroom do to society. The topic of this discussion is the mere effects of the media becoming involved in the judicial system.The uncertainty amongst the jury is nothing new; there have been cases of a hanging jury or even mistrials because the jury can't seem to come to a concrete decision. However, with the media as their backbone and the battery the media uses to toy with their minds; is the direct

Courtroom Spacial Distribution and Positioning

1627 words - 7 pages Through observing legal proceedings undertaken at the Downing Centre’s district and local courts, it can be seen that power and power relations are expressed in the courtroom through many different aspects of the court performance. The courtroom is an intentionally organised space and therefore the structure of the courtroom and the positioning of key players are suggestive of the existing power disparity. The internal architecture of the

Camus Symbol

998 words - 4 pages Courtroom symbol:In the courtroom drama that comprises the second half of The Stranger, the court symbolizes society as a whole. The law functions as the will of the people, and the jury sits in judgment on behalf of the entire community. In The Stranger, Camus strengthens this court-as-society symbolism by having nearly every one of the minor characters from the first half of the novel reappear as a witness in the courtroom. Also, the court's

Surveillance Cameras

1006 words - 5 pages Surveillance cameras have been in use since 1942 when inventor and engineer Walter Burch fist used cameras at a rocket launch site in Peenemunde, Germany. Surveillance cameras have come a long way since then, they are now small enough to fit into the palm of your hand and some can even zoom in and read the lines of the magazine you are reading from across the room. Cameras are now being used to aid the police when investigating crimes, and also

Courts and Power Relations

1495 words - 6 pages The courtroom is a ritualised space, involving costume, language, spatial organisation and so on, and courts, therefore, constitute performative exercises of power. Discuss some of the ways in which courts demonstrate power and/or power relations. The courtroom is a ritualised space in which many features are effectively manipulated to demonstrate the states power over the individual. It is because of such displays of power that the courtroom

Surveillance Cameras

1254 words - 5 pages percent drop in Airdrie, Scotland, a 68 percent reduction in Glasgow, Scotland, and a 57 percent drop in Northampton” (Taylor 44+). Without the use of cameras everywhere, there would be an excessive amount of accidents, killings, burglaries, drugs, and illegal acts. The use of law enforcement cameras help decrease drug trades, capture traffic violations, and protect neighborhoods without affecting the privacy of citizens. Surveillance cameras

Similar Essays

Cameras In The Courtroom Essay

2610 words - 10 pages Cameras in the Courtroom Throughout history there have always been issues concerning judicial courts and proceedings: issues that include everything from the new democracy of Athens, Greece, to the controversial verdict in the Casey Anthony trial as well as the Trayvon Martin trial. One of the more recent and ever changing issues revolves around cameras being allowed and used inside courtrooms. It was stated in the Handbook of Court

Cameras And The Courtroom Essay

1755 words - 7 pages have access to the goings on inside a courtroom but this is sadly not true. Due to the lack of cameras inside the courtroom, only those privileged enough to obtain a seat in the court may view the session, even though every single American has the right to view the proceedings, whether they want to or not. Cameras must be allowed in all courtrooms in order for the public to see the trials as well as for the benefit of those present. With the

False Memories In The Courtroom Essay

2292 words - 9 pages you helped convict a man based on an eyewitness testimony, and twenty-four years down the road you find out that new DNA evidence exonerated him? It is safe to say no one wants that kind of guilt on his conscience. For these reasons it is pertinent to examine memory, its fallibility, and its role in the courtroom. Before diving into specific problems in memory, it is imperative to understand the basics of memory, which goes through

Cameras In The Court: Is It Really Aganist Our Rights?

632 words - 3 pages cameras in a courtroom may impose upon the right of a fair case by distracting and affecting everyone in the courtroom. Now the solution to this problem seems obvious; ban cameras from the court. However, doing that infringes upon another basic right granted to American citizens; the freedom of press. American citizens have the right to document and publish almost anything. The banning of cameras from courtrooms can diminish a person’s ability to