Culture Relativism Essay

848 words - 3 pages

Culture Relativism


Culture Relativism is a contradictory theory for the explanation of the way we ought to live because the roots of the theory don’t give any explanation for what is right and wrong but instead only a means for right and wrong to be judged.
By no fathom of the imagination can one contend that his or her own self ideas are correct there are certain bias that come with all judgments on the correct way to live, but if culture relativism stood true than it must be able to give some sort of universal truth. To produce a theory that says in its entirety the correct way to live depends on the culture you were brought up in and that is a truth contradicts itself.
Culture relativists contend that this is a truth all people are different and we all have different moral codes. I think for the most we do, but to what does this argument mean?
For all intents and purposes a true person accepts the means of diversity and the right for a person to believe what they want, oh wait I guess if I were to say that and be a culture relativist I would have to listen to someone tell me that in country X they think that everyone should think just alike and if you stray from that you will get shot. I would listen to the way things worked in country X and smile and say “different strokes for different folks”. Just because someone is raised in a different culture and has certain beliefs is one thing, but there are certain inalienable stances in this world that must be right or wrong (at least in theory) and making these stances and believing they are true would be an absolute impossibility for culture relativists. Because no matter what you would believe, you would also have to believe that someone else was as equally correct as yourself.
Although I do understand the rational of understanding there are different cultures and quite frankly many of them have very good reasoning for the things they do, I would like to point out the case study that was looked at in James Rachel’s essays, The Elements of Moral Philosophy Rachel’s makes a clear distinction in the essay about the habits of Eskimos to commit infanticide and genocide of the elderly.
Then a very thought-provoking rational was extended to the reasoning behind such cases, Eskimos are a very isolated and nomadic group the ability to...

Find Another Essay On Culture Relativism

What exactly is cultural relativism in metaethics? Is cultural relativism true? Can cultural relativists uphold the principle of cultural tolerance?

2125 words - 9 pages universal or culturally-neutral moral standard which can be justified throughout all societies, at all times. This indicates that there is no objective truth in morality and judgments of 'right' and 'wrong' are simply matters of opinion confined to a certain culture. Hence, Cultural Relativism is the belief that the truth or falsity of moraljudgments or their justification, is not absolute or universal, but is relative to the convictions or

"What exactly is "cultural relativism" in metaethics? Is cultural relatisim true? Can cultural relativists uphold the principle of cultural tolerance?

2380 words - 10 pages Cultural relativism is one of many alternatives within the domain of metaethics, a theory relating to moral judgments and whether they are truth-apt (capable of being true or false). This theory is supported by Ruth Benedict as she argues that normality is relative to culture, to be morally "good" tantamount with normal, so therefore morality is relative to culture. However her statement that normality is synonymous with being morally good is

The Development Of Epistemic Relativism Versus Social Relativism

1598 words - 6 pages “epistemic relativism” and “social relativism".” Hyperreality is a term used to describe an inability of consciousness to distinguish reality from a simulation of reality, especially in technologically advanced post-modern societies. Umberto Eco explains this idea of hyperreality by relating it to the American culture that he explored during his travels. His travels of course lead him to the "absolutely fake cities," Disneyland and Disney World

HUME AND BILL

1090 words - 5 pages Philosophy as “that some central aspect of experience, thought, evaluation, or even reality is somehow relative to something else.” There is no ultimate truth in the universe, because ultimately everything is relative to something else. The groundwork for relativism was laid down by Hume, and because relativism is rife in today’s culture, Hume is heavily influential in today’s world. Much to the misfortune of the world, this branch of philosophy

education

525 words - 2 pages Culture relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within his own social context. In other words ''right'' and ''wrong'' are cultural specific; what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another. Since no universal standard of morality exists, no one has the right to judge another society's customs. Cultural relativism is widely accepted in modern anthropology. Cultural

Ethical Relativism and Cultural Relativism

797 words - 3 pages In explaining Cultural Relativism, it is useful to compare and contrast it with Ethical Relativism. Cultural Relativism is a theory about morality focused on the concept that matters of custom and ethics are not universal in nature but rather are culture specific. Each culture evolves its own unique moral code, separate and apart from any other. Ethical Relativism is also a theory of morality with a view of ethics similarly engaged in

Theory: Moral Relativism

1910 words - 8 pages progress. Moral Relativism implies that there does not exist a culture-independent criterion of moral right and wrong, and thus each moral principle is as valid as others. It then follows that no one can criticize any moral code and there could be no moral progress. But such conclusion is inconsistent with what actually happens in history. Many social reformers strived to improve the moral codes of their society, replacing the old, less-justified

Philosophy

3719 words - 15 pages culture could claim access to any absolute system of values beyond that. Since Boaz and Mead were anthropologists, this gave cultural relativism the dignity, not just of a philosophical theory, but of a scientific discovery. Strong statements about cultural relativism are also associated with another famous anthropologist, and friend of Mead's, Ruth Benedict. Today the anthropological empirical evidence that cultures are different is usually regarded

right and wrong

857 words - 3 pages In the passage, Ethical Relativism: Who's to Judge What's Right and Wrong? had a absolutist point of view. As an absolutist, I agree and think it is not what culture defines as moral to actually be moral at all. For example, If I start believing in a pebble and tell everyone that the pebble is a god; They believe in it yet it doesn't make it wholly universally moral.Ethical relativism refers to the values of cultures, not being questioned or

Relativism between Societies

1338 words - 5 pages The meta-ethical theory of relativism claims that there is no universal moral standard that can be used to evaluate the practices and beliefs of other cultures. For the relativist, 'true' only means 'true for my culture', while at the same time, what someone in another culture deems as true, regardless of the contrast, can be equally so (Williams 1976: 34). This means that the criterion for what is deemed acceptable for a given society, is

Relativism in Farenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury

1149 words - 5 pages of a relative culture. The philosophy of relativism is a growing trend in the society of American students. In Fahrenheit 451, relativism makes up almost the entire society. This story shows that the course of a society without solid principles can be destructive. Today in American society absolutists are viewed as close-minded and judgmental because of outside misconceptions. For example, in William B. Irvine’s article Confronting Relativism

Similar Essays

What Is Culture Relativism: Views By James Rachels

1237 words - 5 pages Culture Relativism; what is it? Culture Relativism states that we cannot absolute say what is right and what is wrong because it all depends in the society we live in. James Rachels however, does not believe that we cannot absolute know that there is no right and wrong for the mere reason that cultures are different. Rachels as well believes that “certain basic values are common to all cultures.” I agree with Rachels in that culture relativism

Fourth Paper

1552 words - 7 pages considered arguments for normative relativism. The first is that different cultures have different moral codes. Therefore, there is no objective truth in morality (Benedict, 2). Furthermore, what is morally wrong or wrong is only a matter of opinion and opinions vary from culture to culture. Benedict describes how those who we regard as abnormal may function adequately in other cultures. She gives the example of homosexuals who are condemned in some

A Summary Of Epistemic Relativism Essay

1181 words - 5 pages “epistemic relativism” and “social relativism"” (Chin-Chung 314) Hyperreality is a term used to describe an inability of consciousness to distinguish reality from a simulation of reality, especially in technologically advanced post-modern societies. Umberto Eco explains this idea of hyperreality by relating it to the American culture that he explored during his travels. His travels, of course lead him to the "absolutely fake cities," Disneyland and

Triumphal Truth Essay

1718 words - 7 pages surrounding culture or our own view of right and wrong. This mindset of relativistic truth reflects the evolutionistic worldview—creation of the physical world occurred through mutations and creation of thought and reason develops through relativism. On a website called Moral Relativism, it states, “evolution teaches that life is accidental, without meaning or purpose.” Since the evolutionary theory is scientifically proven as valid, evolving truth